Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNINSUBRIA
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNINSUBRIA

|

UNI-FIND

uninsubria.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Implementing robotic surgery for uterine cancer in the United States: Better outcomes without increased costs

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2020
Abstract:
Objective: To examine the effect of robotic-assisted surgery implementation for treatment of endometrial cancer in the United States on 30-day clinical outcomes and costs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of adult patients who underwent total hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in the US hospitals in Premier Healthcare Database between January 1, 2008 and September 30, 2015. We conducted trend analyses comparing the proportions of surgical approaches with the associated clinical outcomes and costs over the study period using Mann-Kendall tests. Clinical outcomes and costs of robotic-assisted surgery, laparoscopic and open surgery have been compared after propensity score 1:1 matching in the most recent 3 years (January 1, 2013–September 30, 2015). Results: Of a total of 35,224 patients, use of robotic-assisted surgery increased from 9.48% to 56.82% while open surgery decreased from 70.4% to 28.1% over the study period. A 2.5% decrease in major complications (P < .001), a 2.9% decrease in minor complications (P = .001), and a 2.0% decrease 30-day readmissions (P = .001) was observed across all surgical approaches. Perioperative 30-day total cost slightly decreased from US $11,048 to US $10,322 (P = .08). Among propensity-score matched patients, robotic-assisted surgery was associated with shorter hospitalization than open surgery (median [interquartile range], 2.0 [2.0–3.0] vs 4.0 [3.0–6.0] days) and laparoscopic surgery (2.0 [2.0–3.0] vs 3.0 [2.0–4.0] days), fewer 30-day complications (20.1% vs 33.7%) (all P < .001), and comparable perioperative 30-day total costs (median [interquartile range], US $12,200 [US $9,509-US $16,341] vs US $12,018 [US $8,996-US $17,162]; P = .34) with open surgery. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery facilitated the widespread diffusion of a minimally invasive approach nationally for endometrial cancer, with reduction of perioperative morbidity and no increase in overall treatment-related 30-day costs at national level.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su Rivista
Keywords:
Costs; Endometrial cancer; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Morbidity; Robotic surgery; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; United States; Young Adult
Elenco autori:
Casarin, J.; Song, C.; Multinu, F.; Cappuccio, S.; Liu, E.; Butler, K. A.; Glaser, G. E.; Cliby, W. A.; Langstraat, C. L.; Ghezzi, F.; Fu, A. Z.; Mariani, A.
Autori di Ateneo:
CASARIN JVAN
GHEZZI FABIO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://irinsubria.uninsubria.it/handle/11383/2097998
Pubblicato in:
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Journal
  • Accessibilità
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0