Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNINSUBRIA
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNINSUBRIA

|

UNI-FIND

uninsubria.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2019
abstract:
Objective: To determine the sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID)for the self-administered Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5)in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Design: Prospective single-group observational study. Methods: The LCI-5 was administered to 110 patients (69 males [63%]; median [interquartile range]age, 60 [48–69]years)before and after prosthetic training. The external anchor administered after the program was a 7-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS)designed to quantify the effect (improvement or deterioration)of the intervention. Results: Test–retest reliability of the LCI-5 (n = 30)was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1]= 0.92). The minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 5.66 points. After triangulating these results with those of the mean-change approach and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve analysis (area under the ROC curve ≥ 0.90), based on a different GRCS score splitting, we identified 2 cutoffs for the LCI-5: a change of 7 points, indicating the MCID, and 12 points, indicating “large improvement” in locomotor capabilities (12.5% and 21.4% of the maximum possible score, respectively). Conclusions: The LCI-5 showed a high ability to detect change over time (responsiveness). The 2 proposed values (MCID of 7 points and large improvement of 12 points), based on a mix of distribution- and anchor-based approaches, represent cutoffs that can accurately identify 2 different levels of true change (as perceived by the patient)in locomotor capability after prosthetic training.
Iris type:
Articolo su Rivista
Keywords:
Leg prosthesis; Lower-limb amputation; Outcome assessment; Prosthetic training; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation
List of contributors:
Franchignoni, F.; Traballesi, M.; Monticone, M.; Giordano, A.; Brunelli, S.; Ferriero, G.
Authors of the University:
FERRIERO GIORGIO
Handle:
https://irinsubria.uninsubria.it/handle/11383/2126715
Published in:
ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Journal
  • Accessibility
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0