Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNINSUBRIA
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNINSUBRIA

|

UNI-FIND

uninsubria.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Projects
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Conventional versus cross-linked polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2015
abstract:
The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 88 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with either conventional polyethylene or cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) from the same manufacturer were compared. There were no significant differences between the 2 subpopulations regarding average age, gender, side affected, or prosthetic stem and cup size. The average follow-up was 104 months (range, 55 to 131 months). To the authors' knowledge, this is the longest follow-up for this particular insert. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually. Results showed that XLPE has a significantly greater wear reduction than that of standard polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. At the longest available follow-up for these specific inserts, XLPE proved to be effective in reducing wear.
Iris type:
Articolo su Rivista
Keywords:
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
List of contributors:
Surace, MICHELE FRANCESCO; Monestier, Luca; Vulcano, Ettore; Harwin, Steven F.; Cherubino, Paolo
Authors of the University:
SURACE MICHELE FRANCESCO
Handle:
https://irinsubria.uninsubria.it/handle/11383/2024206
Published in:
ORTHOPEDICS
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

http://www.healio.com/orthopedics/journals/ortho/2015-9-38-9/%7Bd7d3d721-b1ad-447f-88d7-3390dff18c2c%7D/conventional-versus-cross-linked-polyethylene-for-total-hip-arthroplasty.pdf
  • Accessibility
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.6.1.0