Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNINSUBRIA
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNINSUBRIA

|

UNI-FIND

uninsubria.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Arch and access vessel complications in penetrating aortic ulcer managed with thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2019
Abstract:
Background: To analyze our experience and to describe access and arch-related challenges when performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs).Methods: This is a single-center, observational, cohort study. Between October 2003 and February 2019, 48 patients with PAU were identified; 37 (77.1%) treated with TEVAR were retrospectively analyzed. Primary major outcomes were early (< 30 days) and late survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), and a composite endpoint of arch/vascular access-related complications.Results: On admission, 17 (45.9%) patients were symptomatic with 4 (10.8%) presenting with rupture. Inhospital mortality was 8.1% (n=3). We observed 10 (27.0%) arch/access-related complications. There were 4 (10.8%) arch issues: 2 transient ischemic attacks and 2 retrograde acute type A dissections which required emergent open conversion for definitive repair. Access issues occurred in 6 (16.2%) patients: 3 (8.1%) required common iliac artery conduit, and 1 (2.7%) patient required iliac artery angioplasty to deliver the stent-graft. In addition, 2 (5.4%) patients developed access complications which required operative repair [femoral patch angioplasty (n=2), and femoral pseudoaneurysmectomy (n=1)]. Arch/access-related mortality rate was 5.4% (n=2) and median follow-up was 24 (range, 1-156; IQR, 3-52) months. Estimated survival was 87.1% (standard error: 0.6; 95% CI: 71.2-84.9%) at 1 year, and 63.3% (SE: 0.9; 95% CI: 44.1-79%) at 4 years. Estimated freedom from reintervention was 88.9% (SE: 0.5; 95% CI: 74.8-95.6%) at 1 year, and 84.2% (SE: 0.7; 95% CI: 67.3-93.2%) at 4 years. No arch/access-related issues developed during the follow-up period.Conclusions: Our experience confirms that vascular access and aortic arch issues are still a challenging aspect of performing TEVAR for PAUs. Our cumulative 27% rate of access/arch issues is lower than previously reported due to both technological advancements and meticulous management of both access routes and arch anatomy.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su Rivista
Keywords:
Access complications; Retrograde type A dissection; Stroke after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (stroke after TEVAR); Thoracic penetrating aortic ulcers (thoracic PAUs);
Elenco autori:
Piffaretti, G.; Fontana, F.; Tadiello, M.; Guttadauro, Chiara; Piacentino, F.; Bush, R. L.; Socrate, A. M.; Tozzi, M.
Autori di Ateneo:
Centro di ricerche in Radiologia Interventistica
Centro di ricerche per lo studio e l'applicazione di nuove tecnologie in chirurgia vascolare
FONTANA FEDERICO
PIACENTINO FILIPPO
PIFFARETTI GABRIELE
TOZZI MATTEO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://irinsubria.uninsubria.it/handle/11383/2080988
Link al Full Text:
https://irinsubria.uninsubria.it//retrieve/handle/11383/2080988/117318/ARCH%20PAUs.pdf
Pubblicato in:
ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

http://www.annalscts.com/article/view/16636/pdf
  • Accessibilità
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0