Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNINSUBRIA
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNINSUBRIA

|

UNI-FIND

uninsubria.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients having lymphadenectomy, sentinel node mapping followed by lymphadectomy and sentinel node mapping alone: Long-term results of a propensity-matched analysis

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2020
Abstract:
Objective: Sentinel node mapping (SLNM) has replaced lymphadenectomy for staging surgery in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Here, we evaluate long-term survival of three different approaches of nodal assessment in EC. Methods: This is a multi-institutional retrospective study evaluating long-term outcomes (at least 3 years) of EC patients having lymphadenectomy, SLNM followed by lymphadenectomy and SLNM alone. In order to reduce possible confounding factors we applied a propensity-matched algorithm. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Applying a propensity score matching algorithm we selected 180 patients having SLNM (90 SLNM vs. 90 SLNM followed by lymphadenectomy). Additionally, a control group of 180 patients having lymphadenectomy was selected using the same criteria. Overall, 10% of patients were diagnosed with positive nodes. Low volume disease was observed in 16 cases (5 micrometastasis and 11 isolated tumor cells). Patients having SLNM followed by lymphadenectomy had a higher possibility to be diagnosed with a stage IIIC disease in comparison to lymphadenectomy alone (p=0.02); while we did not observe difference in the diagnostic value of SLNM followed by lymphadenectomy and SLNM (p=0.389). Median follow-up time was 69 months (range, 7–206). The survival analysis comparing the three techniques did not show statistical differences in terms of disease-free (p=0.570, log-rank test) and overall survival (p=0.911, log-rank test); Similarly, they did not impact on survival outcomes after stratification by low, intermediate and high risk patients. Conclusions: Our study highlighted that SLNM provides similar long-term oncologic outcomes than lymphadenectomy. Further evidence is warranted to assess the prognostic value of low-volume disease detected by ultrastaging in patients following SLNM.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su Rivista
Keywords:
Endometrial cancer, sentinel node mapping; Lymphadenectomy; Survival
Elenco autori:
Bogani, G.; Casarin, J.; Maggiore, U. L. R.; Ditto, A.; Pinelli, C.; Dell'Acqua, A.; Lopez, S.; Chiappa, V.; Brusadelli, C.; Guerrisi, R.; Ferrero, S.; Ghezzi, F.; Raspagliesi, F.
Autori di Ateneo:
CASARIN JVAN
GHEZZI FABIO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://irinsubria.uninsubria.it/handle/11383/2097999
Pubblicato in:
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Journal
  • Accessibilità
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0