Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNINSUBRIA
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNINSUBRIA

|

UNI-FIND

uninsubria.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Level on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol– or Apolipoprotein B–Related Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2024
Abstract:
Background Conventional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) quantification includes cholesterol attributable to lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)-C) due to their overlapping densities. Objectives The purposes of this study were to compare the association between LDL-C and LDL-C corrected for Lp(a)-C (LDLLp(a)corr) with incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in the general population and to investigate whether concomitant Lp(a) values influence the association of LDL-C or apolipoprotein B (apoB) with coronary events. Methods Among 68,748 CHD-free subjects at baseline LDLLp(a)corr was calculated as "LDL-C-Lp(a)-C," where Lp(a)-C was 30% or 17.3% of total Lp(a) mass. Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted models were applied for the association between the outcome incident CHD and: 1) LDL-C and LDLLp(a)corr in the total sample; and 2) LDL-C and apoB after stratification by Lp(a) mass (>=/<90th percentile). Results Similar risk estimates for incident CHD were found for LDL-C and LDL-C-Lp(a)corr30 or LDL-C-Lp(a)corr17.3 (subdistribution HR with 95% CI) were 2.73 (95% CI: 2.34-3.20) vs 2.51 (95% CI: 2.15-2.93) vs 2.64 (95% CI: 2.26-3.10), respectively (top vs bottom fifth; fully adjusted models). Categorization by Lp(a) mass resulted in higher subdistribution HRs for uncorrected LDL-C and incident CHD at Lp(a) >= 90th percentile (4.38 [95% CI: 2.08-9.22]) vs 2.60 [95% CI: 2.21-3.07]) at Lp(a) <90th percentile (top vs bottom fifth; P(interaction)0.39). In contrast, apoB risk estimates were lower in subjects with higher Lp(a) mass (2.43 [95% CI: 1.34-4.40]) than in Lp(a) <90th percentile (3.34 [95% CI: 2.78-4.01]) (P(interaction)0.49). Conclusions Correction of LDL-C for its Lp(a)-C content provided no meaningful information on CHD-risk estimation at the population level. Simple categorization of Lp(a) mass (>=/<90th percentile) influenced the association between LDL-C or apoB with future CHD mostly at higher Lp(a) levels.
Tipologia CRIS:
Articolo su Rivista
Keywords:
apolipoprotein B; coronary heart disease; general population; lipoprotein(a); low-density lipoprotein
Elenco autori:
Arnold, N.; Blaum, C.; Goßling, A.; Brunner, F. J.; Bay, B.; Zeller, T.; Ferrario, M.; Brambilla, P.; Cesana, G.; Leoni, V.; Palmieri, L.; Donfrancesco, C.; Ojeda, F.; Linneberg, A.; Söderberg, S.; Iacoviello, L.; Gianfagna, F.; Costanzo, S.; Sans, S.; Veronesi, G.; Thorand, B.; Peters, A.; Tunstall-Pedoe, H.; Kee, F.; Salomaa, V.; Schnabel, R. B.; Kuulasmaa, K.; Blankenberg, S.; Waldeyer, C.; Koenig, W.
Autori di Ateneo:
FERRARIO MARCO MARIO ANGELO
GIANFAGNA FRANCESCO
VERONESI GIOVANNI
Link alla scheda completa:
https://irinsubria.uninsubria.it/handle/11383/2179211
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Journal
  • Accessibilità
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0